Bava Kama 114 - 119 - Issue #19
8 - 13 Tammuz 5754 / 17 - 22 June 1994

---

This issue is dedicated in the memory of Samuel and Fannie Goldberg O.B.M.

---

This publication is also available in the following formats: Explanation of these symbols

---

Three Sides to a Story

The Case:	A man pursues another with an obvious intention of murdering him. While the intended victim takes hurried flight an heroic bystander in turn pursues the intended murderer to prevent him from committing his crime even if he must slay him to do so. All three of them - pursuer, pursued and rescuer - break vessels belonging to others in the course of their action which ends up with all of them still alive.
	The Pursuer	The Pursued	The Rescuer
The Rule:	The pursuer cannot be compelled to pay for any damage he caused while engaged in his murderous pursuit. (He does have a moral obligation to provide compensation but the court cannot compel him.)	The pursued is free from paying for any damage caused to the property of his pursuer but must compensate anyone else whose vessels he broke in order to escape his pursuer.	The rescuer is free from paying for damages caused to anyone's property while engaged in his lifesaving mission.
The Reasons:	One who has a death sentence hanging over him at the time that he incurs financial responsibility is exempt from this minor responsibility. Since everyone has the duty to even take his life in order to save his intended victim the pursuer cannot be held responsible for damage caused during this time.	Since the pursued may even take the life of his pursuer in self-defense he may certainly destroy his property if this will help him save his life. As regards damaging someone else's property he may certainly do so in order to save his life but he must make compensation.	In order not to discourage people from taking lifesaving action the Sages decreed that he is free from paying for damage done to anyone's property while engaged in saving a life.

---

Life and Livelihood

Causing someone to lose his source of livelihood is considered as serious as murder. King Saul is referred to (Shmuel II 21:1) as the man "who murdered the Givonim". In actuality Saul had never killed any of these converts whose livelihood was derived from supplying wood and water to the Kohanim performing the sacred altar service at the Sanctuary in Nov. But when he ordered the execution of these Kohanim whom he suspected of conspiring with David in a rebellion against the throne he cut off their source of livelihood and is therefore condemned as the murderer of the Givonim as well.

---

General Editor: Rabbi Moshe Newman
Production Design: Lev Seltzer
HTML Design: Eli Ballon

---

© 1994 Ohr Somayach International - All rights reserved. This publication may be distributed to another person intact without prior permission. We also encourage you to include this material in other publications, such as synagogue newsletters. However, we ask that you contact us beforehand for permission, and then send us a sample issue.

---

This publication is available via E-Mail

---

Ohr Somayach Institutions is an international network of Yeshivot and outreach centers, with branches in North America, Europe, South Africa and South America. The Central Campus in Jerusalem provides a full range of educational services for over 685 full-time students.

The Jewish Learning Exchange (JLE) of Ohr Somayach offers summer and winter programs in Israel that attract hundreds of university students from around the world for 3 to 8 weeks of study and touring.

Ohr Somayach's Web site is hosted by TeamGenesis

---

Copyright © 1994 Ohr Somayach International. Send us feedback.
Dedication opportunities are available for Weekly Daf. Please contact us for details.