
28 November 1998; Issue #215
Contents
Leora from South Africa wrote:
Dear Rabbi
I have 2 questions: I have a non-observant guest
who comes to me every Friday night and sleeps here. She will
switch off the light if it's on when she goes to sleep, and if
the light is off when she comes into the room, she will switch
it on. Is it better for me to leave it on, knowing she will switch
it off (one Shabbat violation), or is it better for me to leave
it off knowing she will switch it on and off (thus doing two Shabbat
violations)? I know that even if I try explain to her not to
do anything with the light, she won't listen.
My second question is, what is the purpose of
writing "beit, samech, daled" at the top of the page?
And when is it necessary? Thank you.
Dear Leora,
If those were your only choices, then it would be
better to leave the light on. That way she will only do one prohibited
act instead of two.
But there are other options. (Don't worry, I won't
suggest removing the light bulb. I assume you've thought of that
and decided it wasn't an option!) Get a "Shabbat clock"
(a timer) which turns the lights on and off automatically. Any
hardware store has them. Till then, how about lighting a candle
in a safe place before Shabbat? Candles are the original Shabbat
clocks, shutting themselves off automatically! Get the proper
length candle, timed to extinguish approximately when she usually
goes to sleep.
Or, how about a small fluorescent desk lamp which
she can cover with an upside down waste basket? (Caution must
be taken against fire, even with a fluorescent bulb.)
Regarding your second question, "beit, samech,
daled" stands for b'siyata d'Shmaya, Aramaic for
"with G-d's help." It's a custom to write it on top
of the page as a prayer for success in what we are about to write,
but it's not an absolute requirement. I've never noticed anyone
writing it when they write a check. Before an exam, I used to
make sure to write it right on top of the form.
Contents
Name@Withheld wrote:
Dear Rabbi,
I am asking this question for a friend at work.
His wife is expecting a baby boy and he asked me whether the
name Ofir (Bereishet 10:29) is OK to use. He and his wife are
both Jewish, anti-religious and want a name from the Bible. However,
they do not want any names that sound too religious. For example
he does not want the name Yeshayahu, etc. Ofir is the name of
one of Yoktan's sons. They are asking for a rabbi's opinion because
I told them sometimes people mistakenly choose names of wicked
people or unclean animals. (He did say that the name Nimrod sounds
nice and is becoming popular in Israel.) Ofir's lineage does
not apparently lead to any righteous people mentioned in the Torah.
Someone said that it is not good to use a name that is not of
a righteous person. Can you shed light on what names should be
used from the Tanach?
Dear Name@Withheld,
According to the Chida in the name of our Sages,
one should avoid using names of people from before the time of
Avraham. Ofir was before Avraham. However, many people are named
Noach, which is apparently an exception.
Regarding names in general, the verse states "zecher
tzadik livracha, v'shem reshaim yirkav." The Talmud
sees this verse as a support for our custom not to use names of
wicked people. Thus it's wrong to name a person Nimrod, especially
since Nimrod tried to murder Avraham, the founder of the Jewish
nation. It would be like naming a child Haman or Adolf.
How about Efraim?
Sources:
- Mishlei 1:7
- Tractate Yoma 38b
Contents
Dr. Aharon Altabe from Paris, Francewrote:
Dear Rabbi,
The Sefer Ta'amei Haminhagim states in the name
of Eliyahu Rabba and Zohar that there is a bone in the brain which
never vanishes. You can't burn it, break it or mill it. I believe
it b'emuna shelemah - with utmost faith - but I would like to
know if someone could tell me more about it: Did you see it or
read about it or hear a Rav ... or a physician who could give
the name of such a bone? Thanks to you.
Dear Dr. Aharon Altabe,
Yes, according to tradition there is a kind of bone
or organ no bigger than a barley corn called the luz or
neskvi; its shape is almost cubic and apparently it lies
at the top of the spine, inside the skull underneath the brain.
It is described as having within it many intertwined spider-like
blood vessels.
It has curious properties: It receives nourishment
only from food eaten Saturday night at the melave malka meal.
And, yes, it is indestructible and doesn't decay in the grave.
The Midrash says that the Roman Hadrian once took a luz and
tried to grind it, burn it, and dissolve it in water, to no avail.
When he hammered it against an anvil, the hammer and anvil broke!
The future resurrection of the dead will be from
this bone; that is, a person will be resurrected from his luz
bone.
The idea behind it is this: The luz symbolizes
the point where physical and spiritual meet. Thus, it is nourished
only from melave malka, the meal eaten between the spiritual
Shabbat and the physical weekday. It's like the Western Wall:
Just as the Western Wall will never be destroyed, and from it
the Third Temple will be built, so too the luz is never
destroyed, and from it the person will be re-built during the
future resurrection.
Regarding the precise identity of the bone, I advise
asking Dr. Eli Temstet from Paris. I am sure he can be of help.
Sources
- Sefer Ta'amei Haminhagim 425
- Bereishet Rabba 25
- Mishna Berurah 300:2
Contents
Jeff wrote:
Dear Rabbi,
In last week's Parsha summary (Toldot) you wrote:
"Esav rushes in, ravenous from a hard day's hunting, and
sells his birthright (and its concomitant spiritual responsibilities)
for a bowl of soup, clearly demonstrating his unworthiness for
the position of the firstborn." Why didn't Yaakov simply
give his brother something to eat? Wouldn't that be the brotherly
(not to mention humanly decent) thing to do? I do, however, understand
how selling the birthright for food demonstrated his unworthiness.
Dear Jeff,
You're asking a good question. Interestingly enough,
there's no clear indication from the text that Yaakov withheld
food from Esav.
On the contrary, the verses indicate that Yaakov
actually did give Esav the food immediately. The verse
says: "He sold his birthright to Yaakov, and Yaakov had
(already) given Esav bread and lentils..." According
to the rules of Hebrew grammar, "had given" is
past perfect: When Esav sold the birthright for money, Yaakov
had already given him free food!
But assuming that Yaakov withheld the food, why
would he do that? The Talmud states: "Said Rabbi Yochanan:
Five sins that wicked one (Esav) transgressed on that day - adultery,
murder, heresy, denial of the future resurrection and despising
of the birthright."
Yaakov knew who his brother was. Esav was totally
unworthy to serve G-d. He would desecrate that service. Esav
was a fraud. The very fact that Esav sold the birthright showed
just how unworthy of it he was. Therefore, Yaakov saw this opportunity
as an obligation to relieve Esav of the birthright.
Sources:
- Haktav V'hakaballa 25:31
- Tractate Bava Batra 15b
Contents
The Year 2000 will, G-d willing, be very special;
so much so that we will not fast on Asara b'Tevet (the
Tenth of Tevet) that year. Why not? (Ohrnet's note:
The Tenth of Tevet commemorates the beginning stage of the destruction
of the Temple. It never occurs on Shabbat).
Answer next week...
The Public Domain
Comments, quibbles, and reactions concerning previous "Ask-the-Rabbi"
features.
Contents
Re: Non-Jewish Spouse (Torah Weekly, Parshas Vayera):
A recent Torah Weekly article titled "Body
and Soul" refers to "saving souls" and to the intermarriage
rate in the US (it is probably similar in Canada). My comment/question
is, could we not consider this situation an opportunity as well?
That is, if we are judicious and caring in our efforts to bring
these people back to Yiddishkeit (or for the non-Jewish spouse,
to convert them), could we not strengthen our People, both in
numbers and vitality? I recognize the difficulties associated
with this course of action, and the need to attempt it with sensitivity
and understanding. I hardly advocate seeking converts for the
purpose of increasing our numbers. However, since we are presented
with the situation, would it not be right to try and "win"
two "strong" Jews as opposed to "losing" one
"weak" one?
Name@Withheld from Thornhill, Ontario, Canada
Ohrnet responds:
Each situation is unique and halachic guidance must be sought in each individual case.
Re: Moon Worship (Ask the Rabbi #212):
Regarding kiddush levanah being mistaken for moon
worship, it is interesting that the ArtScroll Siddur notes that
many congregations recite aleinu following kiddush levanah to
publicly refute this idea, since a basic statement in aleinu is
"it is only to G-d that we pray."
Re: Ask the Rabbi's Interactive Email:
Thank you, Ask the Rabbi, for your kind and sensitive
(and speedy) response to my questions. What a wonderful service!
Truly Heaven sent!
© 1998 Ohr Somayach International - All rights reserved. This publication may be
distributed to another person intact without prior permission. We also encourage you to
include this material in other publications, such as synagogue newsletters. However, we
ask that you contact us beforehand for permission, and then send us a sample issue.
This publication is available via E-Mail
Ohr Somayach Institutions
is an
international
network of Yeshivot and outreach centers, with branches in North America, Europe,
South Africa and South America. The Central Campus in Jerusalem provides a full range of
educational services for over 685 full-time students.
The Jewish Learning Exchange
(JLE) of Ohr Somayach offers summer and winter programs in Israel that attract
hundreds of university students from around the world for 3 to 8 weeks of study and
touring.
The Ohr Somayach Home Page is hosted by TeamGenesis
Copyright
© 1998 Ohr Somayach International.
Send us feedback
Dedication opportunities are available for Ask The Rabbi. Please contact us for details.