The Land Down Under
When relating the story of Korach and his household being miraculously swallowed into the ground, the Torah (Numbers 16:30-34) employs an interesting word-switch that we will closely examine. In response to Korach’s rebellion, Moshe warned that
The Vilna Gaon (1720-1797) explains that the word eretz (or aretz) connotes the national settlement of land, and can be used in the construct form to denote the land of a specific nation. In this way, eretz can be aptly translated as “country”. In many instances, an unspecified eretz refers especially to the Land of Israel. The word adamah, on the other hand, specifically denotes uninhabited lands set aside for agrarian purposes.
Similarly, Malbim (1809-1879) explains that eretz includes the entire earth, from the surface of the planet to its innermost core, while the word adamah generally refers to only the surface layer of the earth’s crust, whose dirt is used for agriculture.
The difference between the words eretz and adamah is accentuated by their respective appearances in ritual blessings over food. Before eating bread, one blesses
Rabbeinu Bachaya (1255-1340) and the Ritva (1250-1330) note that the blessing over bread should have used the more specific word adamah (which refers to a field), but instead uses the vague word eretz. They explain that this is because the Rabbis decided that the wording of the blessing should mirror the terminology of the Bible (Psalms 104:14), which explicitly says that
Rabbi Yechiel Michel Moravsky (Moraftschik) of Lublin (d. 1593) writes that the word eretz is more encompassing than the word adamah because adamah is limited to the immediate top level of dirt, while eretz can mean even that which lies underground. As a result, because the grain needed for making bread develops roots which descend deep underground (see, for example, Yerushalmi Ta’anit 1:3 which asserts that the roots of wheat penetrate fifty handbreadths into the ground), bread is said to come from the eretz. Other vegetables, on the other hand, do not necessarily require such deep roots, and so they are called fruits of the adamah. Rabbi Yisrael Lipschitz (1782-1860) offers a similar explanation.
In light of this distinction between the words eretz and adamah, Rabbi Yaakov Chaim Sofer (Rosh Yeshiva of Yeshivat Kaf HaChaim in Jerusalem) explains the passages concerning the ground swallowing up Korach. He argues that the opening of the ground transpired in two stages: first the uppermost layer of the ground opened up and then the deeper layers of the ground opened up. These two stages are reflected in the word change found in the Bible, as first the Bible uses the word adamah to describe the surface-level opening of the ground, and then it uses the word eretz to record the opening of the subterranean depths.
Nonetheless, in contrast to the explanations above, Rabbi Shlomo Luria (1510-1573) understands that eretz is limited to the surface of the earth, while the word adamah also includes the depths of the land. He explains that bread is said to come forth from the eretz because the word eretz is limited to the surface of the earth and up to three cubits of topsoil (see Rashi to Genesis 6:13). Therefore, when the grains used to make bread shoot forth from the land, they are said to be coming forth from the eretz. However, since vegetables receive their nourishment from the depths of the soil, they are said to be created from the more general word for land, adamah, which includes the eretz and more. These assumptions about the meanings of eretz and adamah are also adopted by the illustrious Wurzberger Rav, Rabbi Yitzchok Dov Bamberger (1807-1878).
Rabbi Yosef Teomim-Frankel (1727-1792), author of the Pri Megadim, writes that the word eretz refers to land in its supernal, unblemished state. (It is therefore appropriately associated with the Holy Land which is viewed as the terrestrial epitome of good). In contrast, the word adamah focuses on the stained and imperfect land which
- Author’s note: Le’Zechut Refuah Shleimah for Bracha bat Chaya Rachel