Daf Yomi

For the week ending 3 March 2012 / 8 Adar I 5772

Temurah 16 - 22

by Rabbi Mendel Weinbach zt'l
The Color of HeavenArtscroll

The Forgotten Laws

Three thousand laws were forgotten by Israel during the days of mourning for Moshe. When the people approached his successor, Yehoshua, and begged him to ask for these laws to be revealed again by Heaven, he replied "It (the Torah) is not in Heaven" (Devarim 30:12). At a later stage in history they approached the Prophet Shmuel with the same request and he explained his inability to do so based on the passage "These are the commands" (Vayikra 27:34) which implies that after Moshe no new permanent commands will be relayed through a prophet.

Both Yehoshua and Samuel realized that they were restrained from prophetically receiving Divine commands to add on to the ones Moshe had relayed to his people. But Yehoshua did not explain this restraint in the same way as Shmuel did. The reason, explains Maharsha, is because Yehoshua had already heard these commands from Moshe but merely forgot them. Having them restored to his memory by prophecy would therefore not come under the category of new commands. He therefore quoted the other passage which is far more comprehensive in regard to a prophet's limitations by declaring that even a clarification of a Torah command will no longer be communicated through a prophet and can only be decided upon through the wisdom of the Sages.

  • Temurah 16a

When Gender is a Blemish

Both the olah sacrifice and the asham sacrifice can be brought only from the male animal. But there is a difference in the status of a female animal consecrated for one of these sacrifices.

In regard to a female consecrated for an olah there is a consensus among the Sages that the animal achieves a status of personal sanctity which can only be removed by redemption if the animal develops a blemish. Only then may the money realized from its redemption be utilized for purchasing a male animal to serve as on olah.

But when it comes to a female consecrated for an asham it is the opinion of Rabbi Shimon that its ineligibility because of gender to serve as a sacrifice is in itself considered a blemish, and it may therefore be redeemed without recourse to any physical blemish.

The difference is thus explained by Rashi:

A female fowl qualifies as an olah sacrifice. We can, therefore, not view gender as an absolute blemish in regard to olah and a physical blemish is required for redemption according to all opinions. Since there is no asham sacrifice from fowl and there is never a possibility of a female serving as an asham, Rabbi Shimon considers the gender to be a sufficient blemish to qualify it for redemption.

  • Temurah 19b

© 1995-2014 Ohr Somayach International - All rights reserved.

Articles may be distributed to another person intact without prior permission. We also encourage you to include this material in other publications, such as synagogue or school newsletters. Hardcopy or electronic. However, we ask that you contact us beforehand for permission in advance at ohr@ohr.edu and credit for the source as Ohr Somayach Institutions www.ohr.edu

« Back to Daf Yomi

Ohr Somayach International is a 501c3 not-for-profit corporation (letter on file) and your donation is tax deductable.