
July 2, 1994; Issue #28
This issue is dedicated in the memory of Simja de Ades
This publication is also available in the following formats:
![[Microsoft Word Format]](../image/worddoc.gif)
Explanation of these symbols |
Subscription Information |
Mark from Washington D.C. wrote:
I was wondering about Euthanasia and Jewish law. I know that
it's wrong to murder, but this is an act of mercy, and wouldn't
euthanasia be like the verse that says to "love the your
fellow person as yourself"?
Dear Mark,
When I began to write this response, my son came over to me and
asked "Abbah, what are you writing?" "An answer
regarding halachic problems with Euthenasia." "But Abbah,
why would the rabbis write about the children in Asia??"
(|:-)
You are correct in your assumption that we are commanded to love
another person (even someone that starts out with a bad joke)-
but, of course this care and concern for others must be expressed
in a manner which is not contrary to Jewish law.
Jewish law forbids euthanasia in all forms, and is considered
an act of homicide. The life of a person is not "his"
- rather, it belongs to the One Who granted that life. It may
be therefore be reclaimed only by the true Owner of that life.
Despite one's noble intentions, an act of mercy-killing is flagrant
intervention into a domain that transcends this world.
One source in the Chumash for this prohibition may be found the
Book of Genesis:
"But your blood of your lives will I require; ...from
the hand of man, from the hand of a person's brother, will I require
the life of man."
The additional phrase "a person's brother" after
having already stated "from the hand of man" is redundant.
The author of the book HaKtav v'haKaballah explains that
this verse refers to a prohibition against euthanasia. Although
murder is the opposite of brotherly love, one might think that
euthanasia is in fact a permitted expression of brotherly love.
This verse imprints on our conscience that this particular form
of "brotherly love" is nothing more than plain murder.
This does not mean that one should be lax about relieving the
other person's pain. Elimination of suffering is a commendable
goal. In fact, this may permit even "aggressive" treatment
of pain to a degree that is not standard medical practice. For
example, heroin use for treatment of pain may be acceptable according
to Jewish law, in spite of the risk of addiction. It may be prohibited,
however, by civil law.
There are other considerations which are beyond the scope of this
column, such as passive/active intervention, prayer for
a suffering person's death, and the definition and treatment of
a moribund patient (goses). These and other related topics
may be further studied of the texts in the accompanying list of
sources.
Sources:
- "Judaism and Healing" - J. David Bleich, Ktav Publishing
House.
- HaKtav v'haKaballah, ibid.
- Bereshis - 9:5.
- "The Jewish Attitude Towards Euthanasia," by Fred
Posner, Jewish Bio-Ethics, by Fred Posner & J. David
Bleich, Sanhedrin Press.
- Jewish Ethics and Halacha for Our Time, by Basil F.
Herring, "Euthanasia", Ktav Publishing.
- Practical Medical Halacha - Association of Orthodox Jewish
Scientists, "Euthanasia", Feldheim Publishing.
- Medical Halacha for Everyone - Abraham S. Abraham,
"Euthanasia or Mercy Killing", Feldheim Publishing.
George from Jerusalem wrote:
I have been to synagogues that have their names stamped on
the outer edge of the pages. Can they be opened on Shabbat or
is that considered erasing and thus forbidden?
Dear George,
The Talmud lists amongst those activities prohibited on Shabbat
that of "Erasing for the purpose of writing two letters."
Generally destruction is prohibited by the Torah only when it
is part of a bigger program of creation. So erasing that is not
for the purpose of writing in the future (such as in our case)
would only be rabbinically prohibited. In the case of the writing
on the siddur there is an additional factor, which might have
effected the halacha which is that when he opens the siddur he
doesn't mean to erase the letters. Even here there would be a
rabbinic prohibition because there is no way to open the book
without erasing the letters (Psik Reisha).
The halachic conclusion in our case is a matter of dispute. There
are those who determined that it is rabbinically prohibited to
open the siddur for the above mentioned reasons. The Mishna Brura
cites the Rema and a majority of halachic authorities who decided
that it is permitted and that the custom is to permit it because
the book is made to be opened and thus the opening of it is no
more an act of erasing than opening a door would be an act of
tearing down a building. He goes on to say that if there is another
book to use you should opt to use that one so that you can satisfy
everyone's opinion. He also mentions that because there are people
who forbid opening such books, you should not stamp words on the
outer edge of the pages of books in the first place.
Sources:
- The Talmud - Tractate Shabbat 73a
- Rabbi Yisroel Meir Kagen - The Mishna Brura, Orach Chaim, 340
© 1994 Ohr Somayach International - All rights reserved.
This publication may be distributed to another person intact without prior
permission. We also encourage you to include this material in other
publications, such as synagogue newsletters. However, we ask that you
contact us beforehand for permission, and then send us a sample issue.
This publication is available via E-Mail
Ohr Somayach Institutions
is an
international network of Yeshivot and outreach centers, with branches in North America, Europe, South Africa and South America. The Central Campus in
Jerusalem provides a full range of educational services for over 685 full-time students.
The Jewish Learning Exchange (JLE)
of Ohr Somayach offers summer and winter programs in Israel that
attract hundreds of university students from around the world
for 3 to 8 weeks of study and touring.
Ohr Somayach's Web site is hosted by TeamGenesis
Copyright © 1994
Ohr Somayach International.
Send us Feedback.
Dedication opportunities are available for Ask The Rabbi. Please contact us for details.